The Professors' Posts

Node Biopsies

 

ACOR CLL List Help Pages

 

TERRY HAMBLIN

Biopsy of a lymph node in CLL is only indicated if there is a suspicion of
Richter's syndrome or some other reason for thinking that there is a cause
other than CLL for the enlargement. There is usually rapid increase in size and
associated systemic symptoms - weight loss, night sweats, fever. If it is just
a CLL node like all the others then there is no need. Needle biopsy is a
pointless investigation (no pun intended). It is good for recognising cancer
cells but hopeless at telling one type of lymphoma from another.

Never take advice from a surgeon on CLL. Always ask your hematologist.
He/she will refer to a surgeon if there is a clinical indication for a biopsy.

TERRY HAMBLIN

If you present with a large lymph node, whatever the eventual diagnosis, you
should first have a blood test. If the diagnosis is any sort of lymphoma,
this may be apparent by finding a monoclonal population of lymphocytes in the
blood. Sometimes a cast iron diagnosis can be made from the particular pattern
of markers. This is usually true for CLL and mantle cell lymphoma, but you
can't really distinguish between follicular lymphoma and marginal cell lymphoma
from the markers, and diffuse large cell lymphoma only rarely spills into
the blood. If you have the diagnosis of CLL then there is no need in most cases
to take a lymph node.

Are there any circumstances when you do need to? Some cases have few if any
cells in the blood, and these are usually called SLL, but it is essentially
the same disease. Sometimes the nodes are inordinately large for the white
count, or a lymph node might have rapidly enlarged so that the physician will
suspect that there might be two diagnoses - CLL and diffuse large cell lymphoma.
Or there may be a group of nodes that has not responded to therapy as well
as the other nodes. I was once given a nasty surprise, when such a group
turned out to be harbouring an unsuspected malignant melanoma.

Nodes in the neck without a blood lymphocytosis present a special problem
because an important cause is metastatic head and neck cancer. I always get an
ENT opinion on these before biopsying them. Fine needle aspirate (FNA) of neck
nodes has no place in the diagnosis of lymphoma, though it may be useful to
detect carcinoma in a node. If possible a whole node should be taken, though
with very large nodes or abdominal nodes that are being biopsied remotely
under CAT scan guidance, we have to be content with only a portion of a node.

Lymph node biopsy is not a job for a general surgeon. In 30 years I referred
to only 2 surgeons who were experts in the field. The node should not be put
in formalin, but sent fresh to the laboratory where it should be cut up and
portioned out; some fixed for histology, some for cytogenetics and/or FISH,
some dispersed for cell markers by Flow cytometry, some for RNA and DNA
extraction, and some frozen for future use.

Another major reason for a lymph node biopsy in CLL is for research. CLL
cells do not divide in the blood but in proliferation centers that are in the
lymph nodes. In order to understand the disease it is necessary to study these
proliferation centers, and for this we need lymph nodes. However, a physician
should discuss with the patient about taking such a node, and the patient
must recognise that he or she is volunteering to making a contribution to
research. Biopsying some lymph nodes is more hazardous than others. The neck is the
favored site. nodes in the armpit contain large amounts of fat, in the groin
they are often reactive to infection. The neck however, is tiger country
with nerves waiting to be pranged. The facial nerve goes through the parotid
gland, and that area is best avoided, just under the chin is the submental nerve
that supplies the lower lip. That's why you need an expert surgeon who is
used to operating in this area. Because the incision can follow the folds of
the neck, there is often no scar.

Return to Professors' Posts

Help Page